chajonbubble 8:35 Thu Apr 16
The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
|
...well, seems like everyone is doing one of these.......
|
|
|
Replies - In Chronological Order ( Show Newest Messages First)
mallard
8:38 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Rolling Stones for me by a country mile
|
strong dreams
8:41 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Agree the Stones. If nothing else they have been around for ten times as long and still put on a great show.
|
Nurse Ratched
8:44 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Has to be the Stones.
|
Leonard Hatred
8:44 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Ridiculous question.
The Beatles were the greatest and most innovative band of all time and single handedly redefined popular music.
The Rolling Stones are an overrated pub rock band.
|
Far Cough
8:45 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Beatles
Groundbreaking
Harmonies
WOW!
|
Nurse Ratched
8:45 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
I will stab you.
|
lab
8:46 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Stones.
|
Fo the Communist
8:47 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
I don't think any band has put out a better string of albums over such a sustained period as the Stones did between 1968 (Beggars Banquet) and 1976 (Black and Blue).
|
Hammer and Pickle
8:48 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Well, apparently John Lennon once out-acid-tripped Keith Richards
https://happymag.tv/the-wild-tale-of-john-lennon-and-keith-richards-acid-fuelled-road-trip/
So there!
|
Leonard Hatred
8:48 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
The Rolling Stones are fucking shit.
|
gank
8:49 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Stones all day long, Beatles only have a following because the people who pretend to like them so much enter some kind of weird gang where they all big each other up for being fans too. Like Star Wars nerds.
|
Hammer and Pickle
8:51 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Was listening to Aftermath the other day.
At once flawless and raw rhythm and blues, most impressive.
|
ted fenton
8:57 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Beatles for me but also loved the Stones Kinks Who need I go on ?
Brilliant era for music
|
New Jersey
8:59 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
As Leonard said, the Beatles redefined popular music, although a bit harsh on Mick and the boys being a pub rock band!!
|
jack flash
9:06 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
I never really saw them as competitors to each other since it's not comparing like for like
I like R & B personally and consider 'Exile on Main Street' to be exceptional and easily the best they've ever done
'Sgt Pepper' was a bit special but although they managed to write some pretty iconic songs, the Beatles weren't anything like as talented at playing instruments as the Rolling Stones
To call the Rolling Stones 'shit' is pretty peurile
|
Lee Trundle
9:11 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Stones easily.
My dad took me to see them as my first ever gig.
|
happygilmore
9:11 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
Never got the appeal of the stones. Therefore The Beatles
|
geoffpikey
9:17 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
I listen to the Rolling Stones more.
Which is not very often. But more than The Beatles. Probably just the fatigue of it all.
|
White Pony
9:26 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
I cannot stand the Stones. Plodding, middle of the road shite. I put them on the same level as Status Quo.
Beatles are a bit meh.
|
Iron Duke
9:27 Thu Apr 16
Re: The Beatles v The Rolling Stones
|
The Stones have got so many great tunes: Paint it Black, Sympathy for the Devil, Gimme Shelter, Let’s Spend the Night Together, Satisfaction, Monkey Man, Mother’s Little Helper, She’s a Rainbow.
The Beatles have a few: Day in the Life, Tomorrow Never Knows, Dear Prudence, Helter Skelter, Elenor Rigby, Penny Lane.
The Beatles also have some shit.
I declare the Stones the winners.
|
| 
